TY - JOUR
T1 - 3D printing of conventional and geopolymer concretes
T2 - advancements, challenges, future directions, and cost analysis
AU - Pour, Arash K.
AU - Noroozinejad Farsangi, Ehsan
AU - Yang, T. Y.
AU - Li, Shaofan
AU - Hajirasouli, Aso
AU - Shirkhani, Amir
PY - 2025/11/1
Y1 - 2025/11/1
N2 - Three-dimensional printing (3DP) concrete is revolutionizing the construction industry by significantly speeding up the building process, reducing labor costs, and minimizing material waste. This technology allows for the creation of complex and innovative architectural designs that are difficult to achieve with traditional methods. Additionally, it promotes sustainability by using eco-friendly materials and reducing the carbon footprint of construction projects. Therefore, 3DP concrete (3DP) can be a suitable solution for implementing special and complex design structures, and mass customization with the lowest cost, especially in labor cost reduction and the amount of waste materials. Considering the importance of using 3DP concrete and its increasing development, identifying all the positive and negative aspects of this technology will help researchers cover disadvantages by identifying the weak points and contribute to the development of this science. Therefore, in this paper, a comprehensive analysis of the primary 3DP procedures and their development in construction technology is performed. Additionally, two types of 3DP concrete technologies are studied in this paper ordinary portland cement-based concrete (OPCBC) and geopolymer-based concrete (GBC). In addition, the growth of material manufacturing and the pros and cons of using various cementitious materials in 3DP concrete are explored. The study also covers different 3DP concrete manufacturing methods and examines key properties such as environmental impact, compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths, density, porosity, elastic modulus, heat resistance, and creep. A comparison of the properties and benefits of OPCBC and GBC 3DP concrete is provided, followed by a cost analysis to assess the advantages of 3D-printed concrete construction. The results reveal that the 3DP process and material selection significantly impact pore development. Techniques that use layered materials, such as contour carving and fused deposition modeling (FDM), often exhibit a high prevalence of pores, which diminishes the mechanical properties of the concrete. These findings offer crucial insights for scholars and decision-makers by illuminating the latest advancements and gaps in the field. This deeper understanding helps refine research priorities, informs policy-making, and can direct resources more effectively. By grasping the current state of knowledge, stakeholders are better equipped to address challenges, capitalize on emerging opportunities, and drive innovation in the relevant domain.
AB - Three-dimensional printing (3DP) concrete is revolutionizing the construction industry by significantly speeding up the building process, reducing labor costs, and minimizing material waste. This technology allows for the creation of complex and innovative architectural designs that are difficult to achieve with traditional methods. Additionally, it promotes sustainability by using eco-friendly materials and reducing the carbon footprint of construction projects. Therefore, 3DP concrete (3DP) can be a suitable solution for implementing special and complex design structures, and mass customization with the lowest cost, especially in labor cost reduction and the amount of waste materials. Considering the importance of using 3DP concrete and its increasing development, identifying all the positive and negative aspects of this technology will help researchers cover disadvantages by identifying the weak points and contribute to the development of this science. Therefore, in this paper, a comprehensive analysis of the primary 3DP procedures and their development in construction technology is performed. Additionally, two types of 3DP concrete technologies are studied in this paper ordinary portland cement-based concrete (OPCBC) and geopolymer-based concrete (GBC). In addition, the growth of material manufacturing and the pros and cons of using various cementitious materials in 3DP concrete are explored. The study also covers different 3DP concrete manufacturing methods and examines key properties such as environmental impact, compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths, density, porosity, elastic modulus, heat resistance, and creep. A comparison of the properties and benefits of OPCBC and GBC 3DP concrete is provided, followed by a cost analysis to assess the advantages of 3D-printed concrete construction. The results reveal that the 3DP process and material selection significantly impact pore development. Techniques that use layered materials, such as contour carving and fused deposition modeling (FDM), often exhibit a high prevalence of pores, which diminishes the mechanical properties of the concrete. These findings offer crucial insights for scholars and decision-makers by illuminating the latest advancements and gaps in the field. This deeper understanding helps refine research priorities, informs policy-making, and can direct resources more effectively. By grasping the current state of knowledge, stakeholders are better equipped to address challenges, capitalize on emerging opportunities, and drive innovation in the relevant domain.
KW - Geopolymer-based concrete
KW - Mechanical properties
KW - Ordinary portland cement-based concrete
KW - Three-dimensional (3D)-printing concrete
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105011364169&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://go.openathens.net/redirector/westernsydney.edu.au?url=http://doi.org/10.1061/JSDCCC.SCENG-1636
U2 - 10.1061/JSDCCC.SCENG-1636
DO - 10.1061/JSDCCC.SCENG-1636
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105011364169
SN - 2996-5136
VL - 30
JO - Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
JF - Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
IS - 4
M1 - 03125003
ER -