A Bill of Rights for Australia? : ask Frank Browne

Andrew Moore

A Bill of Rights for Australia? : ask Frank Browne

Andrew Moore

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

Despite the nationÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s purported reputation for a ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã‹Å“fair goÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢, the Fitzpatrick and Browne privilege case suggests that AustraliaÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s political culture contains an authoritarian dimension. As David Marr suggests, Australians ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã…"have only the patchiest record of becoming passionate about great abstractions ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ even the greatest of them, libertyÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã‚Â. A Bill of Rights would not be a panacea, but would form an important first step in safeguarding liberty. As George Williams argues, a Bill or Charter of Rights would give legal effect to our basic freedoms for the first time. It would help to prevent the making of bad laws and be used ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã…"to educate, shape attitudes and bring hope and recognition to people who are otherwise powerlessÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã‚Â. It would help to make better laws and improve the accountability of governments to the people.

Original language	English
Number of pages	5
Journal	Overland
Publication status	Published - 2008

Keywords

Australia
Browne, Frank
civil rights
history
law and legislation
legislative bodies

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Cite this

@article{2bbdecf3ecd847948824a9f531755fa8,

title = "A Bill of Rights for Australia? : ask Frank Browne",

abstract = "Despite the nation{\~A}ƒ{\^A}¢{\~A}¢{"}{\v s}{\^A}¬{\~A}¢{"}{\v z}{\^A}¢s purported reputation for a {\~A}ƒ{\^A}¢{\~A}¢{"}{\v s}{\^A}¬{\~A}‹{\AA}“fair go{\~A}ƒ{\^A}¢{\~A}¢{"}{\v s}{\^A}¬{\~A}¢{"}{\v z}{\^A}¢, the Fitzpatrick and Browne privilege case suggests that Australia{\~A}ƒ{\^A}¢{\~A}¢{"}{\v s}{\^A}¬{\~A}¢{"}{\v z}{\^A}¢s political culture contains an authoritarian dimension. As David Marr suggests, Australians {\~A}ƒ{\^A}¢{\~A}¢{"}{\v s}{\^A}¬{\~A}…{"}have only the patchiest record of becoming passionate about great abstractions {\~A}ƒ{\^A}¢{\~A}¢{"}{\v s}{\^A}¬{\~A}¢{\^a}‚¬{\AA}“ even the greatest of them, liberty{\~A}ƒ{\^A}¢{\~A}¢{"}{\v s}{\^A}¬{\~A}‚{\^A}. A Bill of Rights would not be a panacea, but would form an important first step in safeguarding liberty. As George Williams argues, a Bill or Charter of Rights would give legal effect to our basic freedoms for the first time. It would help to prevent the making of bad laws and be used {\~A}ƒ{\^A}¢{\~A}¢{"}{\v s}{\^A}¬{\~A}…{"}to educate, shape attitudes and bring hope and recognition to people who are otherwise powerless{\~A}ƒ{\^A}¢{\~A}¢{"}{\v s}{\^A}¬{\~A}‚{\^A}. It would help to make better laws and improve the accountability of governments to the people.",

keywords = "Australia, Browne, Frank, civil rights, history, law and legislation, legislative bodies",

author = "Andrew Moore",

year = "2008",

language = "English",

journal = "Overland",

issn = "0030-7416",

publisher = "OL Society ",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Bill of Rights for Australia? : ask Frank Browne

AU - Moore, Andrew

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Despite the nationÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s purported reputation for a ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã‹Å“fair goÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢, the Fitzpatrick and Browne privilege case suggests that AustraliaÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s political culture contains an authoritarian dimension. As David Marr suggests, Australians ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã…"have only the patchiest record of becoming passionate about great abstractions ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ even the greatest of them, libertyÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã‚Â. A Bill of Rights would not be a panacea, but would form an important first step in safeguarding liberty. As George Williams argues, a Bill or Charter of Rights would give legal effect to our basic freedoms for the first time. It would help to prevent the making of bad laws and be used ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã…"to educate, shape attitudes and bring hope and recognition to people who are otherwise powerlessÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã‚Â. It would help to make better laws and improve the accountability of governments to the people.

AB - Despite the nationÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s purported reputation for a ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã‹Å“fair goÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢, the Fitzpatrick and Browne privilege case suggests that AustraliaÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s political culture contains an authoritarian dimension. As David Marr suggests, Australians ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã…"have only the patchiest record of becoming passionate about great abstractions ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ even the greatest of them, libertyÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã‚Â. A Bill of Rights would not be a panacea, but would form an important first step in safeguarding liberty. As George Williams argues, a Bill or Charter of Rights would give legal effect to our basic freedoms for the first time. It would help to prevent the making of bad laws and be used ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã…"to educate, shape attitudes and bring hope and recognition to people who are otherwise powerlessÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã‚Â. It would help to make better laws and improve the accountability of governments to the people.

KW - Australia

KW - Browne, Frank

KW - civil rights

KW - history

KW - law and legislation

KW - legislative bodies

UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/45935

M3 - Article

SN - 0030-7416

JO - Overland

JF - Overland

ER -

A Bill of Rights for Australia? : ask Frank Browne

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this