TY - JOUR
T1 - A case study on the assessment of response modification coefficient and earthquake-induced collapse potential of a high-rise setback tower
AU - Kildashti, Kamyar
AU - Mirghaderi, Rasoul
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - This paper evaluates response modification coefficient (R-factor) and collapse potential of a high-rise tower with setback irregularity under spectral-matched ground motion records. The tower is comprised of two legs with three distinct lateral bearing systems in elevation and curved configuration in plan. Furthermore, it has a setback in elevation, recognised by inclined columns joining two legs of the tower in uppermost stories. These characteristics cause the tower to classify as a complex irregular structure in which using code-based R-factor is highly dubious. In this paper, initially, an analytical model of the tower was subjected to a suite of ground motions to estimate collapse potential and equivalent R-factor in accordance with FEMA P695. Alternatively, structural performance parameters including inter-storey drift ratios, residual drift ratios and plastic hinge rotations were compared to TBI acceptance criteria. To achieve consistent safety margin against collapse, the value of 8 was suitable for R-factor. In spite of satisfactory threshold in accordance with FEMA P695 and TBI guidelines, for a structure with irregular configuration and multiple bearing system, damages can be localised close to zones of change in lateral bearing system that may lead to partial collapse
AB - This paper evaluates response modification coefficient (R-factor) and collapse potential of a high-rise tower with setback irregularity under spectral-matched ground motion records. The tower is comprised of two legs with three distinct lateral bearing systems in elevation and curved configuration in plan. Furthermore, it has a setback in elevation, recognised by inclined columns joining two legs of the tower in uppermost stories. These characteristics cause the tower to classify as a complex irregular structure in which using code-based R-factor is highly dubious. In this paper, initially, an analytical model of the tower was subjected to a suite of ground motions to estimate collapse potential and equivalent R-factor in accordance with FEMA P695. Alternatively, structural performance parameters including inter-storey drift ratios, residual drift ratios and plastic hinge rotations were compared to TBI acceptance criteria. To achieve consistent safety margin against collapse, the value of 8 was suitable for R-factor. In spite of satisfactory threshold in accordance with FEMA P695 and TBI guidelines, for a structure with irregular configuration and multiple bearing system, damages can be localised close to zones of change in lateral bearing system that may lead to partial collapse
KW - earthquake engineering
KW - lateral loads
KW - strains and stresses
KW - structural design
KW - tall buildings
UR - http://handle.westernsydney.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:40316
U2 - 10.1080/15732479.2016.1258428
DO - 10.1080/15732479.2016.1258428
M3 - Article
SN - 1573-2479
VL - 13
SP - 1212
EP - 1229
JO - Journal of Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
JF - Journal of Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
IS - 9
ER -