A comparison of decision-making processes for conventional and complementary medicine in cancer patients

Bridget Carmady, Caroline A. Smith, Ben Colagiuri

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    To understand the decision-making processes involved in conventional medicine and complementary medicine cancer treatment, and the role that information plays, a cross-sectional survey of cancer patients was carried out at 2 Australian cancer centres. Data was obtained from 75 cancer patients. When asked about complementary medicine use, 36 (48%) patients reported using some form of complementary medicine in conjunction with their conventional treatment. In terms of decision-making, our findings suggest that although cancer patients appear to be at different stages of decision-making for complementary medicine compared with conventional medicine, there was no difference between the decision-making process for cancer patients when it comes to utilising conventional medicine or complementary medicine: patients reported comparable high decisional self-efficacy and low decisional conflict for both areas of medicine.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)32-35
    Number of pages4
    JournalComplementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
    Volume19
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Keywords

    • alternative medicine
    • cancer
    • decision making
    • oncology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of decision-making processes for conventional and complementary medicine in cancer patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this