Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A comparison of three modes of online key word sign training to determine efficacy and acceptability in comparison to in-person key word sign training

  • Andy Smidt
  • , Ivy Chou
  • , Leigha Dark
  • , Jessica Rose Wong
  • , Elizabeth Brownlie
  • , Natalie Munro
  • Southern Cross University
  • The University of Sydney
  • Communication & Inclusion Resource Centre (CIRC)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Key Word Sign (KWS) is an unaided form of augmentative and alternative communication where manual signing is used for people with complex communication needs. Communication partners require training; however geographical, familial and personal barriers impact accessing KWS training. Online training has become more common; however, no research has investigated the online delivery of KWS training. This mixed methods study compared efficacy and acceptability of online training programs delivered synchronously, asynchronously or as a combination of both (hybrid), with results from a previous study that measured face-to-face training.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-92
Number of pages14
JournalAAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • communication partner training
  • Key Word Sign
  • online training
  • unaided AAC

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of three modes of online key word sign training to determine efficacy and acceptability in comparison to in-person key word sign training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this