A critical feminist analysis of madness: Pathologising femininity through psychiatric discourse

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapterpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For centuries, women have occupied a unique place in the annals of insanity. Some would say that women are more mad than men, with psychiatric treatment a beneficent force that sets out to cure the disordered female mind. This chapter offers an alternative explanation – that women are subjected to misdiagnosis and mistreatment by experts whose own pecuniary interests can be questioned, as can their use (or abuse) of power. Women in specific demographic groups – in particular, working class women, black women, older women and lesbians – are at the highest risk of over diagnosis of psychiatric problems. Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) or premenstrual syndrome (PMS) stands as an example of normal female behaviour being discursively constructed as mad, resulting in women taking up a psychiatric diagnosis, with consequences for how their behaviour is subsequently judged. Changes in gender roles after the 1960s and 1970s resulted in the marginalisation of hysteria as a diagnostic category.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRoutledge International Handbook of Critical Mental Health
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Pages72-78
Number of pages7
ISBN (Electronic)9781315399577
ISBN (Print)9781138225473
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 selection and editorial matter, Bruce Cohen; individual chapters, the contributors.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A critical feminist analysis of madness: Pathologising femininity through psychiatric discourse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this