Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A cross-sectional survey of Australian healthcare professionals’ confidence, evidence-based knowledge and guideline use for antenatal asthma management

  • Thomas Wright
  • , Karen Mclaughlin
  • , M.E. Jensen
  • , Maralyn Foureur
  • , Vanessa E. Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Asthma is one of the most common chronic health conditions experienced during pregnancy and is associated with numerous adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Aims: To better understand the confidence, evidence-based knowledge and guideline use among healthcare professionals around Australia commonly involved in providing antenatal care for women with asthma. Materials and Methods: An online, cross-sectional survey was developed and distributed to maternity carers (obstetricians and midwives), primary carers (general practitioners and general practice nurses) and respiratory specialists (respiratory physicians and respiratory nurses). Self-reported confidence and use of clinical guidelines were recorded. Evidence-based knowledge was assessed with 13 questions relating to four clinical scenarios that covered recommendations from national and international guidelines. Results: Primary carers and respiratory specialists were more confident in providing antenatal asthma care, more likely to use clinical guidelines and scored significantly higher in evidence-based knowledge of antenatal asthma management than maternity carers (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in evidence-based knowledge among healthcare professionals from metropolitan, regional and rural backgrounds. However, healthcare professionals who used clinical guidelines scored significantly higher than those who did not (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Greater utilisation of clinical guidelines could improve the evidence-based knowledge of maternity carers. However, the absence of antenatal asthma management in obstetric- and maternity-specific guidelines poses a potential barrier that needs to be addressed. Furthermore, the development of multidisciplinary antenatal clinics, staffed by respiratory nurses and/or physicians, could improve outcomes for pregnant women with asthma who are not undertaking shared care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)681-687
Number of pages7
JournalAustralia and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume62
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A cross-sectional survey of Australian healthcare professionals’ confidence, evidence-based knowledge and guideline use for antenatal asthma management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this