A flexible dual task paradigm for evaluating an embodied conversational agent : modality effects and reaction time as an index of cognitive load

Catherine J. Stevens, Guillaume Gibert, Yvonne Leung, Zhengzhi Zhang

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paperpeer-review

    Abstract

    A new experimental method based on the dual task paradigm is used to evaluate speech intelligibility of an embodied conversational agent (ECA). The experiment consists of the manipulation of auditory-visual (AV) versus auditory-only (A) presentation of speech. In the dual task, participants perform two tasks concurrently. The secondary task is sensitive to cognitive processing demands of the primary task. In the primary task participants either shadowed words or named the superordinate categories to which words belonged, as the word items were spoken by the ECA under A or AV conditions. Reaction time (RT) on the secondary task-swatting a fly on the ECA face-was affected by the difficulty of the concurrent task. The secondary RT was affected by modality of presentation of the primary task. Using a relatively primitive ECA, RT on the secondary task was significantly slower when shadowing occurred in AV versus A conditions. The benefits of this evaluation system, that returns quantitative behavioural data and self-report ratings, are discussed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA 2011), Reykjavik, Iceland, September 15-17, 2011
    PublisherSpringer
    Pages331-337
    Number of pages7
    ISBN (Print)9783642239731
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011
    EventIVA (Conference) -
    Duration: 15 Sept 2011 → …

    Publication series

    Name
    ISSN (Print)0302-9743

    Conference

    ConferenceIVA (Conference)
    Period15/09/11 → …

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A flexible dual task paradigm for evaluating an embodied conversational agent : modality effects and reaction time as an index of cognitive load'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this