Abstract
The Federal Court in the following decision determined that the respondent had not infringed copyright in the applicant's project homes and plans. Of particular importance to the respondent's case was the fact that they had retained a series of plans leading up to the allegedly infringing home design and thus were able to demonstrate a “clear evolution of design".
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Australian Intellectual Property News |
Volume | 270 |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |