A reconsideration of Rwandan Archaeological ceramics and their political significance in a post-genocide era

John Daniel Giblin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper reviews Rwandan ceramic typologies and integrates these with recent regional ones through the consideration of four new ceramic assemblages dating to three distinct phases across the past 2,000 years. In addition to providing a synthesis of ceramic approaches as a research resource, it also suggests that ceramics previously termed type C might now better be understood as a transitional form of Urewe. In so doing, it both describes how previous accounts of Rwanda's archaeological ceramics reproduced a contested ethno-racial colonial construction of Rwandan society and suggests the replacement of these with non-ethno-racial explanations of material culture change proposed elsewhere for comparable circumstances in Great Lakes Africa. Finally, as the government seeks to reintroduce secondary school history teaching using archaeological narratives, it discusses the contemporary political significance of this and other research in post-genocide Rwanda, arguing that archaeology, whether framed in technical language or not, has contemporary political reference
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)501-529
    Number of pages29
    JournalAfrican Archaeological Review
    Volume30
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A reconsideration of Rwandan Archaeological ceramics and their political significance in a post-genocide era'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this