Abstract
This paper considers the complex relationships between the human and ecological elements of sustainability that exist in the minds of stakeholders and argues that a sensemaking approach allows these to be better understood and compared. This is supported by the results of a study, set in a financial institution, exploring the relationships between these non-financial elements of corporate sustainability. The viewpoints of middle management, branch and contact centre employees, executives, a community consultative council, suppliers and a community partner of a large Australian bank obtained in in-depth interviews are analysed and compared utilizing an innovative methodology of semantic analysis. We find that these stakeholders' perceptions of the human-ecological relationship differ by group, containing different mixes of trade-offs and synergies between the non-financial elements of corporate sustainability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 230-244 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Business Strategy and the Environment |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A sensemaking approach to trade-offs and synergies between human and ecological elements of corporate sustainability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver