TY - JOUR
T1 - A systems approach to examining disaster response : using Accimap to describe the factors influencing bushfire response
AU - Salmon, Paul M.
AU - Goode, Natassia
AU - Archer, Frank
AU - Spencer, Caroline
AU - McArdle, Dudley
AU - McClure, Roderick J.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - This article argues that systems theory-based human factors methods have a key role to play in examining and enhancing systems of disaster response. This argument is supported by a first-of-its-kind test application of a popular risk management framework to describe bushfire response activities. Specifically, an Accimap of the response to a recent major Australian bushfire was constructed. The case study is used to test a series of predictions made by the risk management framework in order to test the applicability of this approach in a bushfire response context and to determine whether systems theory-based frameworks are compatible with the analysis of disaster response activities. In conclusion, the output demonstrates that such approaches are suited to the analysis of disaster response efforts. Moreover, it is argued that, compared to the existing individual component failures approach, this holistic systems approach provides a more comprehensive understanding of response performance and better promotes improvements to the overall disaster response system.
AB - This article argues that systems theory-based human factors methods have a key role to play in examining and enhancing systems of disaster response. This argument is supported by a first-of-its-kind test application of a popular risk management framework to describe bushfire response activities. Specifically, an Accimap of the response to a recent major Australian bushfire was constructed. The case study is used to test a series of predictions made by the risk management framework in order to test the applicability of this approach in a bushfire response context and to determine whether systems theory-based frameworks are compatible with the analysis of disaster response activities. In conclusion, the output demonstrates that such approaches are suited to the analysis of disaster response efforts. Moreover, it is argued that, compared to the existing individual component failures approach, this holistic systems approach provides a more comprehensive understanding of response performance and better promotes improvements to the overall disaster response system.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:72831
U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.003
M3 - Article
SN - 0925-7535
VL - 70
SP - 114
EP - 122
JO - Safety Science
JF - Safety Science
ER -