Abstract
Background: To minimize the reaction time and position judgment error using stopwatch-timed measures, we developed a smartphone application to measure performance in the five-time sit-to-stand (FTSTS) and timed up-and-go (TUG) tests. Objective: This study aimed to validate this smartphone application by comparing its measurement with a laboratory-based reference condition. Methods: Thirty-two healthy elderly people were asked to perform the FTSTS and TUG tests in a randomized sequence. During the tests, their performance was concurrently measured by the smartphone application and a force sensor installed in the backrest of a chair. The intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(2,1)] and Blande-Altman analysis were used to calculate the measurement consistency and agreement, respectively, between these two methods. Results: The smartphone application demonstrated excellent measurement consistency with the lab-based reference condition for the FTSTS test [ICC(2,1) = 0.988] and TUG test [ICC(2,1) = 0.946]. We observed a positive bias of 0.27 seconds (95% limits of agreement, -1.22 to 1.76 seconds) for the FTSTS test and 0.48 seconds (95% limits of agreement, -1.66 to 2.63 seconds) for the TUG test. Conclusion: We cross-validated the newly developed smartphone application with the laboratory-based reference condition during the examination of FTSTS and TUG test performance in healthy elderly.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-4 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal |
Volume | 35 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Open Access - Access Right Statement
Copyright ©2016, Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Keywords
- geriatrics
- older people
- smarphones