TY - JOUR
T1 - Access to assisted reproductive technologies in Australia : time for legislative change in Queensland and the Northern Territory to remove the ability to discriminate based on relationship status or sexuality
AU - McGrady, A.
AU - Smith, M.
AU - Allan, Sonia
PY - 2023/5/1
Y1 - 2023/5/1
N2 - This article examines legislative provisions in Queensland and the Northern Territory, which allow for assisted reproductive technology (ART) service providers to discriminate against people based on their relationship status and/or sexuality. We provide several arguments that add weight to the recent proposal of the Queensland Human Rights Commission that the relevant section of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld) be repealed, and extend our arguments to the Northern Territory. The provisions in both jurisdictions are out of sync with key legal developments in the rest of Australia, do not accord with societal views, and are potentially invalid due to federal law. Further, the Queensland provision is potentially incompatible with the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld). Although currently ART service providers do not appear to discriminate based on relationship status or sexuality, the current legislative framework leaves open the potential to do so, without an avenue for those impacted to challenge it in law. We conclude such provisions should be repealed.
AB - This article examines legislative provisions in Queensland and the Northern Territory, which allow for assisted reproductive technology (ART) service providers to discriminate against people based on their relationship status and/or sexuality. We provide several arguments that add weight to the recent proposal of the Queensland Human Rights Commission that the relevant section of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld) be repealed, and extend our arguments to the Northern Territory. The provisions in both jurisdictions are out of sync with key legal developments in the rest of Australia, do not accord with societal views, and are potentially invalid due to federal law. Further, the Queensland provision is potentially incompatible with the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld). Although currently ART service providers do not appear to discriminate based on relationship status or sexuality, the current legislative framework leaves open the potential to do so, without an avenue for those impacted to challenge it in law. We conclude such provisions should be repealed.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:74619
UR - https://uws.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61UWSTSYD_INST/1ro067c/cdi_pubmed_primary_37271959
M3 - Article
SN - 1320-159X
VL - 30
SP - 191
EP - 211
JO - Journal of Law and Medicine
JF - Journal of Law and Medicine
IS - 1
ER -