Addressing the challenge of developing a conceptual definition for clinical judgment

Sharon Jacobs, Lesley Wilkes, Christine Taylor, Kathleen Dixon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Critical thinking, clinical reasoning, clinical decision making and clinical judgment, are used interchangeably in nursing literature. This presents a problem for nurses educating students to develop their clinical judgement. This paper reports on an integrative review undertaken to uncover whether it is feasible to continue using these concepts interchangeably. Data collection involved a search of relevant electronic databases for publications between 1980 and 2015 using such keywords as critical thinking, clinical reasoning, clinical decision making and clinical judgment. 23 papers met the inclusion criteria for the integrative review. Content analysis of the papers generated a total of 13 characteristics shared by the four concepts, which means that any one of the concepts can be used as a variable to measure changes in student nurses' thought processes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalNursing and Health
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Open Access - Access Right Statement

Copyright©2016 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Keywords

  • critical thinking
  • nursing
  • nursing assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Addressing the challenge of developing a conceptual definition for clinical judgment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this