Aesthetic divisions and intensities in the Australian art field

Tony Bennett, Modesto Gayo

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

Abstract

Focusing on the Australian Cultural Fields survey data and household interviews relating to the Australian art field, this chapter develops four main lines of argument. First, while qualified and complicated by the force of age and gender, the data testifies to the continuing strength of the relations between family background, level of education and class position in determining both the degree and kinds of involvement in the Australian art field. Second, tastes also manifest the strong influence of education and class. They do so at the most general level in differentiating responses to figurative and non-figurative art forms, albeit that this is complicated by the force of age. Third, the degree of intensity invested in involvement in the visual arts is, more often than not, an inherited disposition strongly connected to family background. Finally, we pay particular attention to the distinctive qualities associated with liking Aboriginal art, particularly the respects in which, even in its abstract forms, it is differentiated from other forms of abstract art in view of the respects in which it testifies to politically purposive story telling.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFields, Capitals, Habitus: Australian Culture, Inequalities and Social Divisions
EditorsTony Bennett, David Carter, Modesto Gayo, Michelle Kelly, Greg Noble
Place of PublicationU.K.
PublisherRoutledge
Pages14-31
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9780429402265
ISBN (Print)9781138392298
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • art
  • sociology
  • aesthetics
  • Australia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aesthetic divisions and intensities in the Australian art field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this