Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Against Asia-centric methods : Australia-China theoretic-linguistic knowledge co-production

  • Michael Singh

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter offers many significant insights about the challenging possibilities for transcultural knowledge co-production. To do so, this study presents findings from Australia-China knowledge co-production made possible via the Research Oriented, School-Engaged Teacher-Researcher Education (ROSETE) curriculum at the University of Western Sydney. The first section of this chapter interrogates key insights from Chen's (2010) work, contributing to the debates over his questionable claims for Asia-centric methods. In situating this curriculum within the important debates relating to Chen's work, I aim to further our work of reconstituting the scholarly disputation within the field of internationalizing (Euro-American) education. Following an exploration of the challenging possibilities for Australia-China theoretic-linguistic knowledge co-production, the key analysis section is grounded in the data from ROSETE curriculum. The analysis has been structured to clearly address a series of interrelated curriculum questions (Lin, 2012).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAsia as Method in Education Studies: A Defiant Research Imagination
EditorsHongzhi Zhang, Philip Wing Keung Chan, Jane Kenway
Place of PublicationU.K.
PublisherRoutledge
Pages144-162
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9781315767505
ISBN (Print)9781138785960
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Asia
  • Australia
  • China
  • education
  • educational change
  • international education
  • research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Against Asia-centric methods : Australia-China theoretic-linguistic knowledge co-production'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this