An alternate view of the glass cliff : is she pushed or does she volunteer?

Terry R. Sloan, Kathryn J. Hayes, Abigail N. James

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paperpeer-review

    Abstract

    Data mining psychometric measures for a multi-national sample of 8,759 adults (including 445 female and 973 male leaders), led to abductive research to develop an alternate explanation for studies positing that women comprise the preferred candidates for leadership positions associated with high probabilities of failure. Drive to Improvise™ (DI) scores were analyzed to explore the traits shared by senior managers and executives who occupied precarious positions. Results confirmed significantly higher DI in both female and male leaders, and that female leaders showed significantly higher DI than their male peers. Female leaders may knowingly accept difficult but personally motivating leadership positions, providing an alternate explanation of the glass cliff construct - agentic women are neither naïve nor passive when accepting demanding leadership roles.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 28th Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management Conference (ANZAM 2014): Reshaping Management for Impact, 3-5 December 2014, UTS Business School, Sydney, Australia
    PublisherANZAM
    Number of pages37
    ISBN (Print)9780987596857
    Publication statusPublished - 2014
    EventAustralian and New Zealand Academy of Management. International Conference -
    Duration: 3 Dec 2014 → …

    Conference

    ConferenceAustralian and New Zealand Academy of Management. International Conference
    Period3/12/14 → …

    Keywords

    • women
    • leadership
    • organizational culture
    • management
    • sex differences
    • diversity in the workplace

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An alternate view of the glass cliff : is she pushed or does she volunteer?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this