An analysis of Australian Research Council’s grants in religion

Adam Possamai, Gary Long, Victor Counted

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this article, we used the meta-metrics approach to analyse research grants in the Religion and Religious Studies field of research (FoR) in Australia, with respect to their metric properties, significance, similarity, and usage characterisation. Whilst comparing and contrasting various results from the dataset of the Australian Research Council (ARC) on the success of its grant capture, we found the following: an imbalance in the FoR between the quan-tity of publications and that of national competitive grant capture in Australia (highlighting the problem of research significance) and a disparity between the use of keywords on religion without using corresponding FoR codes (as an expression of usage characterisation). These findings are examined in parallel with the last 2018 ARC’s Excellence in Research for Australia report.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)74-95
Number of pages22
JournalJournal for the Academic Study of Religion
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jul 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Equinox Publishing Ltd 2021.

Keywords

  • Australian Research Council
  • Excellence in Research for Australia
  • global rank-ings
  • religious studies
  • research grants

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An analysis of Australian Research Council’s grants in religion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this