An examination of the different ways that non-native phones may be perceptually assimilated as uncategorized

Mona M. Faris; Catherine T. Best; Michael D. Tyler

doi:10.1121/1.4939608

An examination of the different ways that non-native phones may be perceptually assimilated as uncategorized

Mona M. Faris, Catherine T. Best, Michael D. Tyler

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined three ways that perception of non-native phones may be uncategorized relative to native (L1) categories: focalized (predominantly similar to a single L1 category), clustered (similar to > 2 L1 categories), and dispersed (not similar to any L1 categories). In an online study, Egyptian Arabic speakers residing in Egypt categorized and rated all Australian English vowels. Evidence was found to support focalized, clustered, and dispersed uncategorized assimilations. Second-language (L2) category formation for uncategorized assimilations is predicted to depend upon the degree of perceptual overlap between the sets of L1 categories listeners use in assimilating each phone within an L2 contrast.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	EL1-EL5
Number of pages	5
Journal	Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume	139
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4939608
Publication status	Published - 2016

Keywords

phonetics
second language acquisition
speech perception

Access to Document

10.1121/1.4939608

Cite this

@article{147897f37ca74c4cbe6c45d37333b69f,

title = "An examination of the different ways that non-native phones may be perceptually assimilated as uncategorized",

abstract = "This study examined three ways that perception of non-native phones may be uncategorized relative to native (L1) categories: focalized (predominantly similar to a single L1 category), clustered (similar to > 2 L1 categories), and dispersed (not similar to any L1 categories). In an online study, Egyptian Arabic speakers residing in Egypt categorized and rated all Australian English vowels. Evidence was found to support focalized, clustered, and dispersed uncategorized assimilations. Second-language (L2) category formation for uncategorized assimilations is predicted to depend upon the degree of perceptual overlap between the sets of L1 categories listeners use in assimilating each phone within an L2 contrast.",

keywords = "phonetics, second language acquisition, speech perception",

author = "Faris, {Mona M.} and Best, {Catherine T.} and Tyler, {Michael D.}",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1121/1.4939608",

language = "English",

volume = "139",

pages = "EL1--EL5",

journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",

issn = "0001-4966",

publisher = "American Institute of Physics",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An examination of the different ways that non-native phones may be perceptually assimilated as uncategorized

AU - Faris, Mona M.

AU - Best, Catherine T.

AU - Tyler, Michael D.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This study examined three ways that perception of non-native phones may be uncategorized relative to native (L1) categories: focalized (predominantly similar to a single L1 category), clustered (similar to > 2 L1 categories), and dispersed (not similar to any L1 categories). In an online study, Egyptian Arabic speakers residing in Egypt categorized and rated all Australian English vowels. Evidence was found to support focalized, clustered, and dispersed uncategorized assimilations. Second-language (L2) category formation for uncategorized assimilations is predicted to depend upon the degree of perceptual overlap between the sets of L1 categories listeners use in assimilating each phone within an L2 contrast.

AB - This study examined three ways that perception of non-native phones may be uncategorized relative to native (L1) categories: focalized (predominantly similar to a single L1 category), clustered (similar to > 2 L1 categories), and dispersed (not similar to any L1 categories). In an online study, Egyptian Arabic speakers residing in Egypt categorized and rated all Australian English vowels. Evidence was found to support focalized, clustered, and dispersed uncategorized assimilations. Second-language (L2) category formation for uncategorized assimilations is predicted to depend upon the degree of perceptual overlap between the sets of L1 categories listeners use in assimilating each phone within an L2 contrast.

KW - phonetics

KW - second language acquisition

KW - speech perception

UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:33415

U2 - 10.1121/1.4939608

DO - 10.1121/1.4939608

M3 - Article

SN - 0001-4966

VL - 139

SP - EL1-EL5

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

IS - 1

ER -

An examination of the different ways that non-native phones may be perceptually assimilated as uncategorized

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this