TY - JOUR
T1 - An indicator system for evaluating megaproject social responsibility
AU - Lin, Han
AU - Zeng, Saixing
AU - Ma, Hanyang
AU - Zeng, Ruochen
AU - Tam, Vivian W. Y.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Megaproject social responsibility (MSR) is fundamentally crucial for megaprojects' sustainable development. In order to provide an approach for effectively evaluating MSR, this study develops a holistic indicator system using a structured methodology and a quantitative analysis model. Addressing the multi-dimensionality of sustainability goals for the well-being of the wider society, the indicator system simultaneously integrates project life-cycle dynamism, stakeholder heterogeneity, and social responsibility interactivity. Furthermore, the indicator system is deliberately tailored for the translation of key issues of MSR into relevant measurements. The indicator system contains 25 indicators at the organizational level and 46 indicators at the project level-a structure which offers a novel typology to organize the attributes of MSR. Moreover, the results provide an alternative solution to the substantive improvement of MSR management-one that balances the interests of every stakeholder.
AB - Megaproject social responsibility (MSR) is fundamentally crucial for megaprojects' sustainable development. In order to provide an approach for effectively evaluating MSR, this study develops a holistic indicator system using a structured methodology and a quantitative analysis model. Addressing the multi-dimensionality of sustainability goals for the well-being of the wider society, the indicator system simultaneously integrates project life-cycle dynamism, stakeholder heterogeneity, and social responsibility interactivity. Furthermore, the indicator system is deliberately tailored for the translation of key issues of MSR into relevant measurements. The indicator system contains 25 indicators at the organizational level and 46 indicators at the project level-a structure which offers a novel typology to organize the attributes of MSR. Moreover, the results provide an alternative solution to the substantive improvement of MSR management-one that balances the interests of every stakeholder.
KW - project management
KW - social responsibility
KW - stakeholders
KW - sustainability
UR - http://handle.westernsydney.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:40618
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.009
DO - 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.009
M3 - Article
SN - 0263-7863
VL - 35
SP - 1415
EP - 1426
JO - International Journal of Project Management
JF - International Journal of Project Management
IS - 7
ER -