An integrated goodness-of-fit and vine copula Framework for windspeed distribution selection and turbine power-curve assessment in New South Wales and Southern East Queensland

Accurate modelling of near surface wind speeds is essential for robust resource assessment, turbine design, and grid integration. This study presents a unified framework comparing four candidate marginal distributions—Weibull, Gamma, Lognormal, and Generalised Extreme Value (GEV)—across 21 years of daily observations from 11 sites in New South Wales and southern Queensland, Australia. Parameters are estimated by maximum likelihood, with L-moments used when numerical fitting fails. Univariate goodness-of-fit is evaluated via information criteria (Akaike Information Criterion, AIC; Bayesian Information Criterion, BIC) and distributional tests (Anderson–Darling, Cramér–von Mises, Kolmogorov–Smirnov). To capture spatial dependence, we fit an 11-dimensional regular vine (“R-vine”) copula to the probability-integral-transformed data, selecting pair-copula families by AIC and estimating parameters by sequential likelihood. A composite score (70% univariate, 30% copula) ranks distributions per location. Results demonstrate that Lognormal best matches central behaviour at most sites, Weibull remains competitive for bulk modelling, Gamma often excels in moderate tails, and GEV best represents extremes. All turbine yield results presented are illustrative, showing how statistical choices impact energy estimates; they should not be interpreted as operational forecasts. In a case study, 5000 joint simulations from the top-two models drive IEC V90 and E82 power curves, revealing up to 10% variability in annual energy yield due solely to marginal choice. This workflow provides a replicable template for comprehensive wind resource and load hazard analysis in complex terrains.