An invited reply to: a comment on: the exploitation of sexual signals by predators: a meta-analysis (2022) White et al.

Thomas E. White; Tanya Latty; Kate D.L. Umbers

doi:10.1098/rspb.2023.0243

An invited reply to: a comment on: the exploitation of sexual signals by predators: a meta-analysis (2022) White et al.

Thomas E. White, Tanya Latty, Kate D.L. Umbers

School of Science

University of Sydney

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We are grateful for the thoughtful commentary of Bernal et al. [1], whose own contributions to questions of eavesdropping and signal evolution have been invaluable. In response to our recent meta-analysis on the subject [2] they raise several conceptual and methodological points, and while we agree—in part or in whole—on many, we do demur on others, which warrant a brief reply.

Original language	English
Article number	20230243
Number of pages	3
Journal	Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume	290
Issue number	1998
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.0243
Publication status	Published - May 2023

Open Access - Access Right Statement

© 2023 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original
author and source are credited.

Notes

WIP MM TBA

Access to Document

10.1098/rspb.2023.0243Licence: CC BY

full textFinal published version, 229 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{13cdacb896ce45f488328dbf7a7da5e5,

title = "An invited reply to: a comment on: the exploitation of sexual signals by predators: a meta-analysis (2022) White et al.",

abstract = "We are grateful for the thoughtful commentary of Bernal et al. [1], whose own contributions to questions of eavesdropping and signal evolution have been invaluable. In response to our recent meta-analysis on the subject [2] they raise several conceptual and methodological points, and while we agree—in part or in whole—on many, we do demur on others, which warrant a brief reply.",

author = "White, {Thomas E.} and Tanya Latty and Umbers, {Kate D.L.}",

year = "2023",

month = may,

doi = "10.1098/rspb.2023.0243",

language = "English",

volume = "290",

journal = "Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",

issn = "0962-8452",

publisher = "Royal Society Publishing",

number = "1998",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An invited reply to

T2 - a comment on: the exploitation of sexual signals by predators: a meta-analysis (2022) White et al.

AU - White, Thomas E.

AU - Latty, Tanya

AU - Umbers, Kate D.L.

PY - 2023/5

Y1 - 2023/5

N2 - We are grateful for the thoughtful commentary of Bernal et al. [1], whose own contributions to questions of eavesdropping and signal evolution have been invaluable. In response to our recent meta-analysis on the subject [2] they raise several conceptual and methodological points, and while we agree—in part or in whole—on many, we do demur on others, which warrant a brief reply.

AB - We are grateful for the thoughtful commentary of Bernal et al. [1], whose own contributions to questions of eavesdropping and signal evolution have been invaluable. In response to our recent meta-analysis on the subject [2] they raise several conceptual and methodological points, and while we agree—in part or in whole—on many, we do demur on others, which warrant a brief reply.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85158890006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2023.0243

DO - 10.1098/rspb.2023.0243

M3 - Article

C2 - 37161331

AN - SCOPUS:85158890006

SN - 0962-8452

VL - 290

JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

IS - 1998

M1 - 20230243

ER -

An invited reply to: a comment on: the exploitation of sexual signals by predators: a meta-analysis (2022) White et al.

Abstract

Open Access - Access Right Statement

Notes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this