TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of phosphorus soil sorption data
T2 - improved results from global least-squares fitting
AU - Tellinghuisen, Joel
AU - Holford, Paul
AU - Milham, Paul J.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Phosphate sorption data are often analyzed by least-squares fitting to the two- or three-parameter Freundlich model. The standard methods are flawed by (1) treating the measured pseudo-equilibrium concentration C as the independent (hence error-free) variable and (2) neglecting the weighting that should accommodate the varying precision of the data. Here, we address both of these shortfalls and use a global fit model to achieve optimal precision in fitting data for five acidic Australian soil types. Each individual dataset consists of measured C values for up to nine phosphate spiking levels C0. For each soil type, there are three–five such datasets from varying levels of phosphate fertilizer pre-exposure (Pf) two years earlier. These datasets are fitted simultaneously by expressing the Freundlich capacity factor a and exponent b as theoretically predicted functions of the assay amounts of Fe, Al, and P measured for each Pf. The analysis allows for uncertainty in both C and C0, with inverse-variance weighting from variance functions estimated by residuals analysis. The estimated presorbed P amounts Q depend linearly on Pf, with positive intercepts at Pf = 0, indicating residual phosphate in the soils prior to the laboratory phosphate treatments. The key takeaway points are as follows: (1) global analysis yields optimal estimates and improved precision for the fit parameters; (2) allowing for uncertainty in C is essential when the data include C values near 0; (3) varying data precision requires weighting to yield optimal parameter estimates and reliable uncertainties.
AB - Phosphate sorption data are often analyzed by least-squares fitting to the two- or three-parameter Freundlich model. The standard methods are flawed by (1) treating the measured pseudo-equilibrium concentration C as the independent (hence error-free) variable and (2) neglecting the weighting that should accommodate the varying precision of the data. Here, we address both of these shortfalls and use a global fit model to achieve optimal precision in fitting data for five acidic Australian soil types. Each individual dataset consists of measured C values for up to nine phosphate spiking levels C0. For each soil type, there are three–five such datasets from varying levels of phosphate fertilizer pre-exposure (Pf) two years earlier. These datasets are fitted simultaneously by expressing the Freundlich capacity factor a and exponent b as theoretically predicted functions of the assay amounts of Fe, Al, and P measured for each Pf. The analysis allows for uncertainty in both C and C0, with inverse-variance weighting from variance functions estimated by residuals analysis. The estimated presorbed P amounts Q depend linearly on Pf, with positive intercepts at Pf = 0, indicating residual phosphate in the soils prior to the laboratory phosphate treatments. The key takeaway points are as follows: (1) global analysis yields optimal estimates and improved precision for the fit parameters; (2) allowing for uncertainty in C is essential when the data include C values near 0; (3) varying data precision requires weighting to yield optimal parameter estimates and reliable uncertainties.
KW - fertilizer pretreatment
KW - Freundlich model
KW - nonlinear least squares
KW - phosphate soil sorption
KW - residuals analysis
KW - weighted least squares
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001301278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/soilsystems9010022
DO - 10.3390/soilsystems9010022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001301278
SN - 2571-8789
VL - 9
JO - Soil Systems
JF - Soil Systems
IS - 1
M1 - 22
ER -