Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy : research priorities from an international Delphi consensus study

  • Sivesh K. Kamarajah
  • , Imran Mohamed
  • , Dmitri Nepogodiev
  • , Richard P. T. Evan
  • , James Hodson
  • , Ewen A. Griffiths
  • , Pritam Singh
  • , Derek Alderson
  • , James Bundred
  • , James Gossage
  • , Benjamin Jefferies
  • , Siobhan McKay
  • , Kobby Siaw-Acheampong
  • , Richard van Hillegersberg
  • , Ravinder Vohra
  • , Kasun Wanigsooriya
  • , Tony Whitehouse
  • , A. Bekele
  • , M. P. Achiam
  • , H. Ahmed
  • A. Ainsworth, K. Akhtar, N. Akkapulu, W. Al-Khyatt, M. Alasmar, B. N. Alemu, R. Alfieri, B. Alkhaffaf, L. S. Alvarez, V. Amahu, N. A. Andreollo, F. Arias, A. Ariyarathenam, A. Arndt, A. Athanasiou, J. S. Azagra, C. Baban, R. Babor, E. Baili, A. Balla, E. Beenen, M. Bendixen, J. Bennett, D. Bergeat, A. J. Bernardes, D. Bernardi, R. Berrisford, A. Bianchi, M. Bjelovic, N. Merrett, et al

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) is an international collaborative group set up to study anastomotic leak outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer. This Delphi study aimed to prioritize future research areas of unmet clinical need in RCTs to reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods: A modified Delphi process was overseen by the OGAA committee, national leads, and engaged clinicians from high-income countries (HICs) and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). A three-stage iterative process was used to prioritize research topics, including a scoping systematic review (stage 1), and two rounds of anonymous electronic voting (stages 2 and 3) addressing research priority and ability to recruit. Stratified analyses were performed by country income. Results: In stage 1, the steering committee proposed research topics across six domains: preoperative optimization, surgical oncology, technical approach, anastomotic technique, enhanced recovery and nutrition, and management of leaks. In stages 2 and stage 3, 192 and 171 respondents respectively participated in online voting. Prioritized research topics include prehabilitation, anastomotic technique, and timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. Stratified analyses by country income demonstrated no significant differences in research priorities between HICs and LMICs. However, for ability to recruit, there were significant differences between LMICs and HICs for themes related to the technical approach (minimally invasive, width of gastric tube, ischaemic preconditioning) and location of the anastomosis. Conclusion: Several areas of research priority are consistent across LMICs and HICs, but discrepancies in ability to recruit by country income will inform future study design.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-73
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume108
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley and Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy : research priorities from an international Delphi consensus study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this