Anthropomorphic language in online forums about Roomba, AIBO and the iPad

J. Fink, O. Mubin, F. Kaplan, P. Dillenbourg

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paperpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What encourages people to refer to a robot as if it was a living being? Is it because of the robot's humanoid or animal-like shape, its movements or rather the kind of interaction it enables? We aim to investigate robots' characteristics that lead people to anthropomorphize it by comparing different kinds of robotic devices and contrasting it to an interactive technology. We addressed this question by comparing anthropomorphic language in online forums about the Roomba robotic vacuum cleaner, the AIBO robotic dog, and the iPad tablet computer. A content analysis of 750 postings was carried out. We expected to find the highest amount of anthropomorphism in the AIBO forum but were not sure about how far people referred to Roomba or the iPad as a lifelike artifact. Findings suggest that people anthropomorphize their robotic dog significantly more than their Roomba or iPad, across different topics of forum posts. Further, the topic of the post had a significant impact on anthropomorphic language.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, May 21 - 23, 2012
PublisherIEEE
Pages54-59
Number of pages6
ISBN (Print)9781467304818
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
EventIEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts -
Duration: 21 May 2012 → …

Conference

ConferenceIEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts
Period21/05/12 → …

Keywords

  • Internet
  • anthropomorphism
  • iPad (computer)
  • laptop computers
  • mobile robots
  • tablet computers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anthropomorphic language in online forums about Roomba, AIBO and the iPad'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this