Antipodean aesthetics, public policy and the museum

Ben Dibley

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

    Abstract

    The Museum of New Zealand-Te papa Tongarewa has proved a complex cultural site that has generated much public debate and a growing academic literature. In this essay I depart from critical approaches that resolve the analysis of this museum by pointing out its programmatic inconsistencies, internal contradictions, representational inadequacies or its institutional paradoxes. While these formulations do get at matters important to the operations of Te Papa, what is striking in these analyses is that the museum somehow always disappoints the critic by not living up to its stated aims or some ideal of the museum form. Rather than establishing Te Papa as an object for reform as these critics have done, I read it as an archive for reflection on the cultural predicament of an antipodean modernity. To this end this essay proceeds by initially establishing the wider movements in which the institution is located. Then it maps how these movements have shaped the museum’s formulations and its reception by focusing on the period leading up to its opening. Finally, it considers a particular antipodean style of representation associated with these movements. In this context, I conclude, Te Papa might best be understood as a monument to ‘antipodean camp’.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationHistory, Power, Text: Cultural Studies and Indigenous Studies
    EditorsTimothy Neale, Crystal McKinnon, Eve Vincent
    Place of PublicationBroadway, N.S.W.
    PublisherUTSePress
    Pages271-290
    Number of pages20
    ISBN (Print)9780987236913
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • museums
    • archive
    • modernity
    • restructure
    • New Zealand

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Antipodean aesthetics, public policy and the museum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this