Are women really that happy at work? : Australian evidence on the ‘contented female’

T. Kifle, P. Kler, S. Shankar

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article investigates the apparent paradox of females possessing higher levels of job satisfaction compared to their male counterparts despite possessing worse employment outcomes. Postulating that the female workforce is heterogeneous by age, education and the presence of children, we create four groups; the aggregated, young and childless, young with children and the educated. The article finds statistical evidence of significant gender differences, though not uniformly so. Econometric results, however, paint a muddier picture, indicating that statistical results alone should not be used to categorically report incidences of gender differences in job satisfaction. Sample-selection bias results also evince sub-group heterogeneity and require further study. The determinants of job satisfaction vary between measures and sub-groups, though not necessarily so across gender. In sum, the article finds that the paradox does exhibit itself for the aggregated and young and childless sub-groups, but is largely absent for the young with children group. As well, there is a clear bifurcation in job satisfaction between genders for the educated sub-group. This suggests that employed females should not be viewed as a monolithic bloc in the labour force.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)686-697
    Number of pages12
    JournalApplied Economics
    Volume46
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Are women really that happy at work? : Australian evidence on the ‘contented female’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this