TY - JOUR
T1 - Associations between app usage and behaviour change in a m-health intervention to improve physical activity and sleep health in adults : secondary analyses from two randomised controlled trials
AU - Murphy, Leah L.
AU - Dascombe, Ben J.
AU - Murawski, Beatrice
AU - Rayward, Anna T.
AU - Brown, Wendy J.
AU - Plotnikoff, Ronald C.
AU - Vandelanotte, Corneel
AU - Holliday, Elizabeth G.
AU - Duncan, Mitch J.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: To examine associations between user engagement and activity-sleep patterns in a 12-week m-health behavioural intervention targeting physical activity and sleep. Methods: This secondary analysis used data pooled from two Randomised Control Trials (RCT, [Synergy and Refresh]) that aimed to improve physical activity and sleep (PAS) among physically inactive adults with poor sleep. Both RCTs include a PAS intervention group (n=190 [Synergy n=80; Refresh n=110]) and a wait list Control (CON n=135 [Synergy n=80; Refresh n=55]). The PAS groups received a pedometer and accessed a smartphone/tablet "app" with behaviour change strategies, and email/SMS support. Activity-sleep patterns were quantified using the activity-sleep behaviour index (ASI) based on self-report measures. Intervention usage was quantified as a composite score of the frequency, intensity and duration of app usage during intervention (range: 0-30). Assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 and 6months. Relationships between usage and ASI were examined using generalised linear models. Differences in ASI between the control group and intervention usage groups (Low [0-10.0], Mid [10.1-20.0], High [20.1-30.0]) were examined using generalised linear mixed models adjusted for baseline values of the outcome. Trial Registration: ACTRN12617000376347; ACTRN12617000680369. Results: During the 3-month intervention, the mean (±sd) usage score was 18.9±9.5. At 3months (regression coefficient [95%CI]: 0.45 [0.22, 0.68]) and 6months (0.48 [0.22, 0.74]) there was a weak association between usage score and ASI in the intervention group. At 3months, ASI scores in the Mid (Mean [95%CI]=57.51 [53.99, 61.04]) and High (60.09 [57.52, 62.67]) usage groups were significantly higher (better) than the control group (51.91 [49.58, 54.24]), but not the Low usage group (47.49 [41.87, 53.12]). Only differences between the high usage and control group remained at 6months.
AB - Background: To examine associations between user engagement and activity-sleep patterns in a 12-week m-health behavioural intervention targeting physical activity and sleep. Methods: This secondary analysis used data pooled from two Randomised Control Trials (RCT, [Synergy and Refresh]) that aimed to improve physical activity and sleep (PAS) among physically inactive adults with poor sleep. Both RCTs include a PAS intervention group (n=190 [Synergy n=80; Refresh n=110]) and a wait list Control (CON n=135 [Synergy n=80; Refresh n=55]). The PAS groups received a pedometer and accessed a smartphone/tablet "app" with behaviour change strategies, and email/SMS support. Activity-sleep patterns were quantified using the activity-sleep behaviour index (ASI) based on self-report measures. Intervention usage was quantified as a composite score of the frequency, intensity and duration of app usage during intervention (range: 0-30). Assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 and 6months. Relationships between usage and ASI were examined using generalised linear models. Differences in ASI between the control group and intervention usage groups (Low [0-10.0], Mid [10.1-20.0], High [20.1-30.0]) were examined using generalised linear mixed models adjusted for baseline values of the outcome. Trial Registration: ACTRN12617000376347; ACTRN12617000680369. Results: During the 3-month intervention, the mean (±sd) usage score was 18.9±9.5. At 3months (regression coefficient [95%CI]: 0.45 [0.22, 0.68]) and 6months (0.48 [0.22, 0.74]) there was a weak association between usage score and ASI in the intervention group. At 3months, ASI scores in the Mid (Mean [95%CI]=57.51 [53.99, 61.04]) and High (60.09 [57.52, 62.67]) usage groups were significantly higher (better) than the control group (51.91 [49.58, 54.24]), but not the Low usage group (47.49 [41.87, 53.12]). Only differences between the high usage and control group remained at 6months.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:72024
U2 - 10.1186/s44167-022-00013-1
DO - 10.1186/s44167-022-00013-1
M3 - Article
SN - 2731-4391
VL - 2
JO - Journal of Activity, Sedentary and Sleep Behaviors
JF - Journal of Activity, Sedentary and Sleep Behaviors
M1 - 4
ER -