Avoiding unfairness : a case for estopping the Commissioner of Taxation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article is a companion piece to my previous article published in 2016 in the University of New South Wales Law Journal foreshadowing the need for another remedy to overcome the ineffectiveness of conventional discretionary and statutory remedies in upholding the concern of the law to avoid practical injustice in the context of private tax rulings. It argues that by drawing analogies with the essential elements for an estoppel in equity, the well-recognised but largely unused "administrative" or "public law" estoppel may be raised to avoid detriment befalling the taxpayer from the unfair exercise of power to make a revised private tax ruling under s 359-55 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth). The article further argues for adoption of the "obligation of consultation" expounded in the seminal UK Court of Appeal decision in R v North and East Devon Health Authority; Ex parte Coughlan as a proxy for the "minimum equity" necessary to avoid detriment notwithstanding the inapplicability in Australia of the notion of "abuse of power" applied in R v North and East Devon Health Authority; Ex parte Coughlan.
Original languageEnglish
Article number4
Pages (from-to)242-270
Number of pages29
JournalAustralian Tax Review
Volume2017
Issue number46
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • taxation
  • law
  • justice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Avoiding unfairness : a case for estopping the Commissioner of Taxation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this