Back to the inverted-U for music preference : a review of the literature

Anthony Chmiel, Emery Schubert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

101 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated the inverted-U model of preference for music as a function of collative variables (especially familiarity and complexity) over the last 115 years. The results of 57 studies on music preference were categorized according to their patterns of preference. Fifty of the 57 studies (87.7%) were categorized as compatible with an overarching (segmented) inverted-U model, while the results of five studies (8.8%) were interpreted as mixed, showing both compatible and incompatible results. Two studies (3.5%) were categorized as completely incompatible with the model. In contrast to authors who describe the model as defunct, this review has observed that studies producing results compatible with the inverted-U are still prevalent. We propose that while there may be inconsistencies with Berlyne's psychobiological theory from a scientific, arousal-based standpoint, the inverted-U model is able to explain a considerable amount of data. Rather, it seems that research interests have moved elsewhere, but caution is urged in asserting denial or dismissal of the relationship in music preference research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)886-909
Number of pages24
JournalPsychology of Music
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • music

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Back to the inverted-U for music preference : a review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this