Balibar's transindividualism : what kind of via negativa?

In this response, while agreeing with Balibar's substantive positive position, I take issue with the way he situates it. Specifically, he casts it as a via negativa in relation to all previously existing thought. I suggest that it would be more accurate to say he is positioning the notion of the transindividual as a via media between two alleged extremes, individualism and organicism. I argue that the idea that there is an opposite and equal error to individualism is mistaken, and that in actuality Balibar's concept of the transindividual is not a radical departure from a long history of anti-individualism.