Biobank classification in an Australian setting

Amanda Rush, Jeffrey H. Christiansen, Jake P. Farrell, Susan M. Goode, Rodney J. Scott, Kevin J. Spring, Jennifer A. Byrne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2011, Watson and Barnes proposed a schema for classifying biobanks into 3 groups (mono-, oligo-, and poly-user), primarily based upon biospecimen access policies. We used results from a recent comprehensive survey of cancer biobanks in New South Wales, Australia to assess the applicability of this biobank classification schema in an Australian setting. Cancer biobanks were identified using publically available data, and by consulting with research managers. A comprehensive survey was developed and administered through a face-to-face setting. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excelâ„¢ 2010 and IBM SPSS Statisticsâ„¢ version 21.0. The cancer biobank cohort (n=23) represented 5 mono-user biobanks, 7 oligo-user biobanks, and 11 poly-user biobanks, and was analyzed as two groups (mono-/oligo- versus poly-user biobanks). Poly-user biobanks employed significantly more full-time equivalent staff, and were significantly more likely to have a website, share staff between biobanks, access governance support, utilize quality control measures, be aware of biobanking best practice documents, and offer staff training. Mono-/oligo-user biobanks were significantly more likely to seek advice from other biobanks. Our results further delineate a biobank classification system that is primarily based on access policy, and demonstrate its relevance in an Australian setting.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)212-218
Number of pages7
JournalBiopreservation and Biobanking
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Australia
  • New South Wales
  • biobanks
  • bioinformatics
  • cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biobank classification in an Australian setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this