Abstract
The New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Amendment (Biodiversity Banking) Bill 2006 was implemented to formalise the concept of biodiversity offsets. Its underpinning focus is to allow development in rapidly urbanising areas of the Sydney region and the coastal ribbon of New South Wales. Under defined circumstances biodiversity impacts due to urban development may be offset elsewhere, often in rural areas, where equivalent biodiversity values are identified. This legislation was modelled on the United States of America (US) wetland mitigation banking approach. I investigated some of the pitfalls of the US experience that should have been considered in the implementation of the New South Wales legislation and conclude that most issues appear to be associated with the narrowness of concepts around biodiversity, deficiencies in compliance, and long term monitoring and management of the offset ecosystems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 544-549 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Australian Zoologist |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 14 Life Below Water
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- New South Wales. Threatened Species Conservation Amendment (Biodiversity Banking) Bill 2006
- United States
- biobanks
- biodiversity
- endangered species
- habitat loss
- urban development
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Biodiversity offsets : lessons from the American experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver