Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Biodiversity recovery is slow following clear-cut harvest of boreal forests

  • S. Ellen Macdonald
  • , Anne C. S. McIntosh
  • , Selena Schut
  • , Samuel Bartels
  • , Seung Il Lee
  • , Elvira Baisheva
  • , Jeff Battigelli
  • , Erin Bayne
  • , Yves Bergeron
  • , Mathieu Bouchard
  • , Brendan Casey
  • , Mats Dynesius
  • , I. Tanya Handa
  • , Joakim Hjältén
  • , Kristoffer Hylander
  • , Matti Koivula
  • , Jari Kouki
  • , Therese Löfroth
  • , Asko Lõhmus
  • , Anders Nielsen
  • Sonya Odsen, Manuela Panzacchi, Jaime Pinzon, Peter B. Reich, Pavel Shirokikh, Ekaterina Shorohova, Ilkka Vanha-Majamaa, Lisa Venier, Tim Work, Linhao Wu
  • University of Alberta
  • University of Northern British Columbia
  • Lakehead University
  • Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Northern Alberta Institute of Technology
  • Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
  • Université du Québec à Montréal
  • Université Laval
  • Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • Stockholm University
  • Luke Natural Resources Institute Finland
  • University of Eastern Finland
  • University of Tartu
  • NIBIO–Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
  • Fuse Consulting Ltd
  • Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
  • Natural Resources Canada
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Boreal forests are important reservoirs of biodiversity, carbon and timber stocks. However, timber harvest can alter biodiversity in these forests without clear evidence on the duration needed for biotic groups to recover. Resilience of boreal forest biodiversity to clear-cut harvest was examined with a meta-analysis of 190 datasets from boreal and hemi-boreal forests of Europe/Russia and North America for arthropods, birds, small mammals, lichens, bryophytes and vascular plants. We modelled similarity of community composition between harvested and unharvested stands versus years post harvest. In approximately half of cases, predicted times for recovery to pre-harvest composition were ≤30 years. In other cases, recovery took much longer or had not occurred within the timeframe of our data; for example, in conifer forest: >100 years (bryophytes), >55 years (small mammals), ~95 years (lichens) and ~85 years (vascular plants). Saproxylic beetles showed no resilience within the 16 (conifer forest) or 29 (mixed forest) years post harvest for which we had data. Recovery generally took longer in conifer and mixed than in broadleaf forests, which always showed either resistance (bryophytes, vascular plants) or resilience with recovery within 12–25 years. Conserving biodiversity in boreal forests will require extended rotations, management for ‘old forest’ structural elements and areas protected from harvesting.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalNature Sustainability
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print (In Press) - 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biodiversity recovery is slow following clear-cut harvest of boreal forests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this