TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomechanical effects following footstrike pattern modification using wearable sensors
AU - Chan, Peter P. K.
AU - Chan, Zoe Y. S.
AU - Au, Ivan P. H.
AU - Lam, Ben M. F.
AU - Lam, W. K.
AU - Cheung, Roy T.H.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objectives: This study sought to examine the biomechanical effects of an in-field sensor-based gait retraining program targeting footstrike pattern modification during level running, uphill running and downhill running. Design: Quasi-experimental design. Methods: Sixteen habitual rearfoot strikers were recruited. All participants underwent a baseline evaluation on an instrumented treadmill at their preferred running speeds on three slope settings. Participants were then instructed to modify their footstrike pattern from rearfoot to non-rearfoot strike with real-time audio biofeedback in an 8-session in-field gait retraining program. A reassessment was conducted to evaluate the post-training biomechanical effects. Footstrike pattern, footstrike angle, vertical instantaneous loading rate (VILR), stride length, cadence, and knee flexion angle at initial contact were measured and compared. Results: No significant interaction was found between training and slope conditions for all tested variables. Significant main effects were observed for gait retraining (p-values ≤ 0.02) and slopes (p-values ≤ 0.01). After gait retraining, 75% of the participants modified their footstrike pattern during level running, but effects of footstrike pattern modification were inconsistent between slopes. During level running, participants exhibited a smaller footstrike angle (p ≤ 0.01), reduced VILR (p ≤ 0.01) and a larger knee flexion angle (p = 0.01). Similar effects were found during uphill running, together with a shorter stride length (p = 0.01) and an increased cadence (p ≤ 0.01). However, during downhill running, no significant change in VILR was found (p = 0.16), despite differences found in other biomechanical measurements (p-values = 0.02–0.05). Conclusion: An 8-session in-field gait retraining program was effective in modifying footstrike pattern among runners, but discrepancies in VILR, stride length and cadence were found between slope conditions.
AB - Objectives: This study sought to examine the biomechanical effects of an in-field sensor-based gait retraining program targeting footstrike pattern modification during level running, uphill running and downhill running. Design: Quasi-experimental design. Methods: Sixteen habitual rearfoot strikers were recruited. All participants underwent a baseline evaluation on an instrumented treadmill at their preferred running speeds on three slope settings. Participants were then instructed to modify their footstrike pattern from rearfoot to non-rearfoot strike with real-time audio biofeedback in an 8-session in-field gait retraining program. A reassessment was conducted to evaluate the post-training biomechanical effects. Footstrike pattern, footstrike angle, vertical instantaneous loading rate (VILR), stride length, cadence, and knee flexion angle at initial contact were measured and compared. Results: No significant interaction was found between training and slope conditions for all tested variables. Significant main effects were observed for gait retraining (p-values ≤ 0.02) and slopes (p-values ≤ 0.01). After gait retraining, 75% of the participants modified their footstrike pattern during level running, but effects of footstrike pattern modification were inconsistent between slopes. During level running, participants exhibited a smaller footstrike angle (p ≤ 0.01), reduced VILR (p ≤ 0.01) and a larger knee flexion angle (p = 0.01). Similar effects were found during uphill running, together with a shorter stride length (p = 0.01) and an increased cadence (p ≤ 0.01). However, during downhill running, no significant change in VILR was found (p = 0.16), despite differences found in other biomechanical measurements (p-values = 0.02–0.05). Conclusion: An 8-session in-field gait retraining program was effective in modifying footstrike pattern among runners, but discrepancies in VILR, stride length and cadence were found between slope conditions.
KW - gait
KW - kinetics
KW - running
KW - training
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:57707
U2 - 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.05.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.05.019
M3 - Article
SN - 1440-2440
SN - 1878-1861
VL - 24
SP - 30
EP - 35
JO - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
JF - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
IS - 1
ER -