Abstract
This article draws upon content analysis of Australian parliamentary transcripts to examine debates about asylum seekers who arrived by boat in three historical periods: 1977-1979, 1999-2001, and 2011-2013. We analyze term frequency and co-occurrence to identify patterns in specific usage of the phrase "boat people." We then identify how the term is variously deployed in Parliament and discuss the relationship between these uses and government policy and practice. We conclude that forms of "discursive bordering" have amplified representations of asylum seekers as security threats to be controlled within and outside Australia's sovereign territory. The scope of policy or legislative responses to boat arrivals is limited by a poverty of political language, thus corroborating recent conceptual arguments about the securitization and extra-territorialization of the contemporary border.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 13-26 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Refuge |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© John Van Kooy et al., 2021.
Open Access - Access Right Statement
© John Van Kooy et al., 2021. This open-access work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits use, reproduction, and distribution in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original authorship is credited and the original publication in Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees is cited.UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '"Boat people" and discursive bordering : Australian parliamentary discourses on asylum seekers, 1977-2013'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver