Abstract
Almost six years on from the introduction of the Pacific Solution, the commitment of Australia's federal government to the regime of offshore processing of asylum seekers appears undiminished. The offshore processing regime has damaged Australia's international standing and has cost its taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars. But its highest cost has been in human terms. This article examines the evolution of Australia's offshore processing regime with reference to its objectives, its consequences and its ramifications for Australia's performance of its human rights obligations under international law.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 33-61 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Human Rights |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- asylum seekers
- human rights
- international law
- refugees
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Boatloads of incongruity : the evolution of Australia's offshore processing regime'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver