Build It Like You Mean It: Replicating Ethical Innovation in Physical and Institutional Design

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the practices and aspirations of householders in relation to governance for sustainability. Kersty Hobson’s argument that domestic consumption of green goods’, such as shower timers and energy efficient lighting, is not just the outcome of such governance but also constitutive of it, is insightful. Matt Watson and Ruth Lane address the issue of up-scaling of household sustainability initiatives that presently sit outside of green governance frameworks, so as to bring about changes to these frameworks. The present restricted framing of waste management governance as an environmental agenda fits poorly with the broad range of social and environmental motives that give impetus to household practices of reuse. Neat governmental agendas for securing sustainability are apt to become unpicked and tangled up in the complexity of household consumption practices. Neo-liberal governance both undermines and relies upon territorial social formations, including the territory of the neo-liberal home so neglected, until recently, by researchers.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMaterial Geographies of Household Sustainability
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Pages157-174
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781317099468
ISBN (Print)9781409408154
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Ruth Lane, Andrew Gorman-Murray and the Contributors 2011.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  3. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Build It Like You Mean It: Replicating Ethical Innovation in Physical and Institutional Design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this