Bundaberg and beyond : duty to disclose adverse events to patients

William J. Madden, Tina Cockburn

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Although much excellent work has been done in Australia and elsewhere to improve the safety and quality of health care provision, the practice of medicine is inherently risky ââ"šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ adverse events sometimes occur. In Australia, practical guidelines for the open disclosure of adverse events to patients have been developed and are being implemented. State and Territory medical boards have recently adopted Codes of Conduct which include disclosure provisions, although the Australian Medical Association's Code of Ethics does not yet contain express patient disclosure provisions. There is a dearth of authority concerning legal obligations to disclose known or suspected adverse events. Although many Australian jurisdictions have introduced statutory protection for those who apologise or express regret to patients following an adverse event, there is no corresponding express statutory disclosure obligation, unlike in some parts of the United States. The Bundaberg experience illustrates the complex ethical, practical and legal issues which arise in this area.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)501-527
    Number of pages27
    JournalJournal of Law and Medicine
    Volume14
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Keywords

    • Australia
    • Australian Medical Association
    • communication in medicine
    • medical care
    • medical errors
    • medical ethics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bundaberg and beyond : duty to disclose adverse events to patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this