Burst gap code predictions for tactile frequency are valid across the range of perceived frequencies attributed to two distinct tactile channels

Kevin K. W. Ng, Ian N. Snow, Ingvars Birznieks, Richard M. Vickery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Perceived frequency of vibrotactile stimuli can be divided into two distinctive cutaneous sensations-flutter (<60 Hz) and vibratory hum (>60 Hz), mediated by two different tactile afferent types [fast adapting type I (FA1) and fast adapting type II (FA2), respectively]. We recently demonstrated a novel form of neural coding in the human tactile system, where frequency perception of stimulus pulses grouped into periodic bursts in the flutter range depended on the duration of the silent gap between bursts, rather than the periodicity or mean impulse rate. Here, we investigated whether this interburst interval could also explain the perceived frequency of electrocutaneous pulse patterns delivered at frequencies above the flutter range. At stimulus rates of 50 to 190 pulses/s, the burst gap model correctly predicted the perceived frequency. This shows that the burst gap code represents a general coding strategy that spans the range of frequencies traditionally attributed to two different tactile channels.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)687-692
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Neurophysiology
Volume125
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 the American Physiological Society.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Burst gap code predictions for tactile frequency are valid across the range of perceived frequencies attributed to two distinct tactile channels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this