Caesarean section among immigrants with different obstetrical risks

Lieu Thi Thuy Trinh, Hassan Assareh, Helen Achat, Seng Chua, Veth Guevarra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AimTo determine the variation in caesarean section rates among immigrant populations. Background: Australia is one of the most multicultural in the world and is also among those with the highest caesarean section rates. Design: Secondary data analysis. Methods: Routinely collected data from a Local Heath District between 2011 and 2015 were analysed. Women were categorized into regional groups based on country of birth. Obstetrical risk was classified using the Robson classification. Results/Findings: In total 48711 women gave birth, of whom 64.0% were born overseas; 13966 had a caesarean section (28.7%). South and Central Asia women had a high number of caesarean sections (n=4139; 29.6% of all caesarean sections), a high overall adjusted caesarean section rate (31.4%; 95% CI, 30.5%-32.3%), and consistently high caesarean section rates among women with single cephalic term pregnancy without a previous caesarean section. High adjusted caesarean section rates were seen among South East Asia women with nulliparous, single cephalic, term pregnancy, and spontaneous labour. Demographic and clinical characteristics explained 83.5% of the variation in overall caesarean section rates between country of birth and 21.8% to 100% depending on Robson group. Conclusions: Caesarean section rates varied by country of birth and within some Robson groups. The studied factors had various effects on the variation in caesarean section rates between country of birth and Robson groups.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12638
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Practice
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Caesarean section among immigrants with different obstetrical risks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this