Can research that is not intended or unlikely to be published be considered ethical?

Christopher Barton, Chun Wah Michael Tam, Penelope Abbott, Sally Hall, Siaw-Teng Liaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background For research to be ethically acceptable, the potential benefits must justify any risks involved for participants. Dissemination of research findings through publication is one way of creating benefit, but not all researchers intend to publish their research. Other factors, such as lack of size or representativeness, generalisability or innovativeness, or negative findings mean the research is unlikely to be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal. Objectives This paper discusses ethical considerations in research where peer-reviewed publication is not intended or unlikely. Discussion Proposing research that is not intended or unlikely to be published in a peer-reviewed journal does not preclude it from being considered ethical. Additional benefits of such projects may include professional development of investigators, pilot data collection leading to more definitive studies, or developing collaborations with research users that increase relevance and improve utility of findings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)442-444
Number of pages3
JournalAustralian Family Physician
Volume46
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • career development
  • ethics
  • publications
  • research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can research that is not intended or unlikely to be published be considered ethical?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this