Can systematic review findings on treatment effectiveness be trusted? : the case of Pilates exercise and chronic low back pain

Cherie Wells, Gregory S. Kolt, Paul Marshall, Bridget Hill, Andrea Bialocerkowski

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In our systematic review of systematic reviews, we concluded that the effectiveness of Pilates exercise in people with CLBP cannot be supported by current research evidence [8]. This is due to the small number, variable methodological quality and heterogeneity of primary studies [8]. We, therefore, recommend that clinicians carefully consider the potential for bias in all research studies, including systematic reviews, before using findings to direct clinical practice. Systematic reviews traditionally may represent the highest level of evidence, but their ability to provide credible results can, in some circumstances, be compromised by the inclusion of non-randomised controlled trials, primary studies of poor methodological quality and the inappropriate use of meta-analyses.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number1000142
    Number of pages2
    JournalJournal of Yoga & Physical Therapy
    Volume3
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Open Access - Access Right Statement

    © 2013 Wells C, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Can systematic review findings on treatment effectiveness be trusted? : the case of Pilates exercise and chronic low back pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this