Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Can urodynamic stress incontinence be diagnosed by ultrasound?

  • Nepean Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis Multichannel urodynamic testing is commonly used to diagnose urodynamic stress incontinence (USI). It has been claimed that USI may be diagnosed by imaging. In this study we determined the predictive value of ultrasound findings for USI. Methods This is an observational study utilising data obtained during urodynamic testing. Data sets were analysed in 209 patients in order to determine the predictive value of sonographic findings for the diagnosis of USI. Results Bladder neck descent and maximal urethral pressure were the only independent predictors of USI identified by multivariate logistic regression. The finding of a cystourethrocele with funnelling increased the odds of a diagnosis of USI by 2.5 (95 % confidence interval 1.17-5.4, p=0.018). Conclusions Translabial ultrasound can identify an anatomical configuration that is associated with USI. However, sonographic findings are insufficient to predict USI and can not replace urodynamic testing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1399-1403
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Urogynecology Journal
Volume24
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Diagnosis
  • Stress incontinence
  • Ultrasound
  • Urinary incontinence
  • Urodynamic stress incontinence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can urodynamic stress incontinence be diagnosed by ultrasound?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this