TY - JOUR
T1 - Cardiovascular safety of celecoxib, naproxen, or ibruprofen for arthritis
AU - Nissen, Steven E.
AU - Yeomans, Neville D.
AU - Solomon, Daniel H.
AU - Lüscher, Thomas F.
AU - Libby, Peter
AU - Husni, M. Elaine
AU - Graham, David Y.
AU - Borer, Jeffrey S.
AU - Wisniewski, Lisa M.
AU - Wolski, Katherine E.
AU - Wang, Qiuqing
AU - Menon, Venu
AU - Ruschitzka, Frank
AU - Gaffney, Michael
AU - Beckerman, Bruce
AU - Berger, Manuela F.
AU - Bao, Weihang
AU - Lincoff, A. Michael
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular safety of celecoxib, as compared with nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), remains uncertain. METHODS: Patients who required NSAIDs for osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis and were at increased cardiovascular risk were randomly assigned to receive celecoxib, ibuprofen, or naproxen. The goal of the trial was to assess the noninferiority of celecoxib with regard to the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death (including hemorrhagic death), nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Noninferiority required a hazard ratio of 1.12 or lower, as well as an upper 97.5% confidence limit of 1.33 or lower in the intention-to-treat population and of 1.40 or lower in the ontreatment population. Gastrointestinal and renal outcomes were also adjudicated. RESULTS: A total of 24,081 patients were randomly assigned to the celecoxib group (mean [}SD]daily dose, 209}37 mg), the naproxen group (852}103 mg), or the ibuprofen group (2045}246 mg) for a mean treatment duration of 20.3}16.0 months and a mean followup period of 34.1}13.4 months. During the trial, 68.8% of the patients stopped taking the study drug, and 27.4% of the patients discontinued follow-up. In the intention-to-treat analyses, a primary outcome event occurred in 188 patients in the celecoxib group (2.3%), 201 patients in the naproxen group (2.5%), and 218 patients in the ibuprofen group (2.7%) (hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. naproxen, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.13; hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. ibuprofen, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.04; P<0.001 for noninferiority in both comparisons). In the on-treatment analysis, a primary outcome event occurred in 134 patients in the celecoxib group (1.7%), 144 patients in the naproxen group (1.8%), and 155 patients in the ibuprofen group (1.9%) (hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. naproxen, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.15; hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. ibuprofen, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.02; P<0.001 for noninferiority in both comparisons). The risk of gastrointestinal events was significantly lower with celecoxib than with naproxen (P = 0.01) or ibuprofen (P = 0.002); the risk of renal events was significantly lower with celecoxib than with ibuprofen (P = 0.004) but was not significantly lower with celecoxib than with naproxen (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: At moderate doses, celecoxib was found to be noninferior to ibuprofen or naproxen with regard to cardiovascular safety. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00346216.)
AB - BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular safety of celecoxib, as compared with nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), remains uncertain. METHODS: Patients who required NSAIDs for osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis and were at increased cardiovascular risk were randomly assigned to receive celecoxib, ibuprofen, or naproxen. The goal of the trial was to assess the noninferiority of celecoxib with regard to the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death (including hemorrhagic death), nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Noninferiority required a hazard ratio of 1.12 or lower, as well as an upper 97.5% confidence limit of 1.33 or lower in the intention-to-treat population and of 1.40 or lower in the ontreatment population. Gastrointestinal and renal outcomes were also adjudicated. RESULTS: A total of 24,081 patients were randomly assigned to the celecoxib group (mean [}SD]daily dose, 209}37 mg), the naproxen group (852}103 mg), or the ibuprofen group (2045}246 mg) for a mean treatment duration of 20.3}16.0 months and a mean followup period of 34.1}13.4 months. During the trial, 68.8% of the patients stopped taking the study drug, and 27.4% of the patients discontinued follow-up. In the intention-to-treat analyses, a primary outcome event occurred in 188 patients in the celecoxib group (2.3%), 201 patients in the naproxen group (2.5%), and 218 patients in the ibuprofen group (2.7%) (hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. naproxen, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.13; hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. ibuprofen, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.04; P<0.001 for noninferiority in both comparisons). In the on-treatment analysis, a primary outcome event occurred in 134 patients in the celecoxib group (1.7%), 144 patients in the naproxen group (1.8%), and 155 patients in the ibuprofen group (1.9%) (hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. naproxen, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.15; hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. ibuprofen, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.02; P<0.001 for noninferiority in both comparisons). The risk of gastrointestinal events was significantly lower with celecoxib than with naproxen (P = 0.01) or ibuprofen (P = 0.002); the risk of renal events was significantly lower with celecoxib than with ibuprofen (P = 0.004) but was not significantly lower with celecoxib than with naproxen (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: At moderate doses, celecoxib was found to be noninferior to ibuprofen or naproxen with regard to cardiovascular safety. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00346216.)
KW - cardiovascular diseases
KW - nonsteroidal anti, inflammatory agents
KW - osteoarthritis
KW - rheumatoid arthritis
UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:37941
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1611593
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1611593
M3 - Article
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 375
JO - The New England Journal of Medicine
JF - The New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 26
ER -