Case note : Construction, Forestry, Mining And Energy Union v Australian Industrial Relations Commission : the AIRC and the exercise of private arbitral power

Simon Kozlina

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    [1] The joint judgment of the Full Bench of the High Court of Australia in Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (‘CFMEU’) determines the powers and role of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (‘the Commission’) in arbitrating and mediating certain industrial disputes. The case discusses the operation of a Certified Agreement under the Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth) (‘IR Act’) and its successor, the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (‘WR Act’). In particular, the High Court clarifies the powers that the Commission exercises when acting as an arbitrator under a Certified Agreement created pursuant to the IR Act. [2] Although the decision re-establishes a broad role for the Commission in workplace dispute resolution, it simultaneously alters its significance in an increasingly de-centralised wage system.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalUniversity of New South Wales Law Journal
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Keywords

    • Australia
    • Australian Industrial Relations Commission
    • Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (Australia)
    • arbitrators
    • dispute resolution (law)
    • industrial relations

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Case note : Construction, Forestry, Mining And Energy Union v Australian Industrial Relations Commission : the AIRC and the exercise of private arbitral power'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this