Casemix funding in psychiatry: some problems and common pitfalls.

P. J. Hay, T. Pearce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate the accuracy of AN-DRG version 2.0 codings. Ninety-two separations, covering three of the most commonly occurring AN-DRG in psychiatry, were reviewed by a psychiatrist. The AN-DRG diagnosis was then compared to that given by morbidity coders. There was agreement for 69 (79 per cent) separations and disagreement for 18 (21 per cent) separations. Recoding of the 18 separations altered average length of stay data and the funding received. The high error rate of coding stimulated changes to the training of morbidity coders and registrars.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-133
Number of pages9
JournalAustralian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Casemix funding in psychiatry: some problems and common pitfalls.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this