Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Characterizing rhythm differences between strong and weak accented L2 speech

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paperpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the rhythmic characteristics of accented L2 speech by using two relatively novel measures of prosodic rhythm: The S-AMPH measure, an index of the degree of synchrony between the stress and syllable amplitude modulation rates; and the Allan Factor measure, that determines the nested clustering of temporal events (in this case peaks in the amplitude envelope) over different timescales. An extreme-group design was used to select strong versus weak foreign accent recordings from a group of Korean and French L2 English talkers saying the same 69-word English passage. For the Korean talkers, both the S-AMPH and the Allan Factor measures differed as a function of the strength of foreign accent. This was not the case for the French talkers, where neither measure differed as a function of foreign accent strength. The difference in outcome between the Korean and French talkers suggests that the measures are not indexing some general property of L2 accent (e.g., production fluency) but rather that picking up some property specific to the strongly accented Korean talkers. We consider several options.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication, INTERSPEECH 2018, 2-6 September 2018, Hyderabad, India
PublisherInternational Speech Communication Association
Pages2568-2572
Number of pages5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
EventINTERSPEECH (Conference) -
Duration: 2 Sept 2018 → …

Publication series

Name
ISSN (Print)2308-457X

Conference

ConferenceINTERSPEECH (Conference)
Period2/09/18 → …

Keywords

  • accents and accentuation
  • oral communication
  • rhythm
  • second language acquisition
  • speech synthesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Characterizing rhythm differences between strong and weak accented L2 speech'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this