Clarifying the role of belief-motive explanations in multi-stakeholder realist evaluation

S. Evans, A. Dadich, B. Stout, D. Plath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In realist evaluation, where researchers aim to make program theories explicit, they can encounter competing explanations as to how programs work. Managing explanatory tensions from different sources of evidence in multi-stakeholder projects can challenge external evaluators, especially when access to pertinent data, like client records, is mediated by program stakeholders. In this article, we consider two central questions: how can program stakeholder motives shape a realist evaluation project; and how might realist evaluators respond to stakeholders’ belief-motive explanations, including those about program effectiveness, based on factors such as supererogatory commitment or trying together in good faith? Drawing on our realist evaluation of a service reform initiative involving multiple agencies, we describe stakeholder motives at key phases, highlighting a need for tactics and skills that help to manage explanatory tensions. In conclusion, the relevance of stakeholders’ belief-motive explanations (‘we believe the program works’) in realist evaluation is clarified and discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101800
Number of pages6
JournalEvaluation and Program Planning
Volume80
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • evaluation
  • projects
  • social service
  • stakeholders

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clarifying the role of belief-motive explanations in multi-stakeholder realist evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this